WritingDialogue in Practice, part 2 of 5
Ask the People Closest to the Work
Early in my career I directed a competitive music program, and I thought we were untouchable. I was prepared, the students worked hard, our rehearsals felt sharp. Then we went to a festival and got beat. Badly. Groups I had privately considered beneath us played with a cohesion we could not touch, and I sat in the audience doing the math that every leader eventually does: how did they play so well? How did I feel so confident, so prepared, and then watch my students sound like they had never rehearsed together?
I want to be precise about what happened next, because it is the whole point of this essay. I did not attend a workshop. I did not find a new method book. I went back to my classroom and asked my students what was not working. Out loud, directly, expecting to be told about acoustics or nerves.
They told me about me.
The buck stops where the trust was placed
Not cruelly. Specifically. They told me they did not actually know what to do when they practiced. And they were right. For example, I had been assigning twenty minutes of practice a day with a parent signature to prove it happened. Twenty minutes of what? I had never said. I was measuring time and compliance because they were easy to measure, and my students, who trusted my feedback and my vision, went home and spent those minutes wandering. The signature verified the wandering occurred.
That was hard to hear, and it should have been. My students had trusted my direction, and the direction was fog. I was failing them, and the failure was invisible from where I stood because everyone was complying. Compliance is what vagueness produces at its very best. The room full of people doing something twenty minutes a day looked, from the podium, exactly like a room full of people improving.
The information that broke the illusion existed in only one place: inside the people doing the work. The students knew practice felt aimless. They had known for months. There was no mechanism by which that knowledge could reach me, because I had never built one, because it had never occurred to me that I was the variable.
What changed
The fix was not motivational. It was clerical, almost embarrassingly so. Practice assignments became specific: these eight measures, at this tempo, solving this problem, and here is how you will know it is solved. Rehearsal feedback changed the same way, from more energy, which means nothing, to statements a student could either execute or ask about. And I kept asking them what was working, on a schedule, so the correction channel I had built by accident stayed open on purpose.
Two years later we swept the same competition, both divisions. I tell that part not as a trophy story but as the experimental result: same director, same kind of students, same hours. The only variable that changed was that direction got concrete and the people doing the work got a voice in calibrating it.
The generalizable part
I have since watched this exact structure inside schools, businesses, and agencies, and the music room was not special. Somewhere in your organization right now there is a twenty-minutes-with-a-signature policy: an instruction people are complying with that has quietly stopped meaning anything, and the only people who know are the people doing it.
Research on employee voice says plainly that improvement-relevant knowledge concentrates at the point of work (Morrison, 2011). But the research undersells how it feels from the leader's chair, which is that everything seems fine. Vagueness does not announce itself. It books no meetings. It just accumulates, in the gap between what you said and what they needed, until a festival, an audit, a resignation, or a bad quarter presents the invoice.
So the practice is simple, and I hold it as method rather than humility theater.
- Go to the people closest to the work and ask what is not working, including whether your own direction is usable.
- When they tell you, treat the specifics as a gift and the discomfort as the price of the gift.
- Convert what you learn into direction concrete enough to be executed, or refused, or improved, by someone who is not inside your head.
- Keep the channel open after it stops stinging.
The people closest to the work are not a constituency to be managed. They are the best instrumentation you will ever have, and unlike most instrumentation, they will calibrate you back if you let them.
References
- Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
- Byers, T. (2026). Listening to Lead: The Seven Canons That Amplify Voice and Transform Organizations. Byers Consulting Group.